In future, the bug tracking and fixing process will be transparent? There are lot of bugs reported by the users last year, but in most cases the feedback from the developers is very reserved. Has the bug report reached the responsible persons? Is the bug fixed? And so on... Why you don't use a transparent bug tracking system? So you can avoid double posts of bugs for example, you can give workarounds for existing bugs and so on. I think this is very useful for both sides.David actually setup a bug tracker on the wiki server. Unfortunately it wasn't opened to the public & also Alex refused to use it.
Will the new version be able to build for Android?Yes, sure... this is one of the last missing functions that we are caring about at the moment.
Why you don't use a transparent bug tracking system? So you can avoid double posts of bugs for example, you can give workarounds for existing bugs and so on. I think this is very useful for both sides.We developed an own bug tracker especially for this purpose and we are using it very intensive these days. We also added the known bugs and screenshots there. But it's still a "closed" system, because we cannot allow that user add their bugs and wishes there without caring about structure and logics.
It can also be very frustrating to see into unsorted lists and thousands of individual wishes. So we will add bugs and wishes manually.
The beta version will probably not include an export function and just be there for testing the new editor. But in the final version it will be there.
