Ok first of all sorry for the late reply. I have family here and I haven't been able to be in the PC until now.I use Shader Toolkit 0.8.9 and Visionaire Editor 4.2I have tried to use Visionaire Editor 4.2.5 and Shader Toolkit 0.9 and my PC crashes every time I try to print log.In ST 0.8.9 and VE 4.2 if I print log I get this:[code]17:04:36: [string "ShaderToolkit old"]:1823: invalid value (nil) at index 1 in table for 'concat'17:04:36: stack traceback: [string "LightSueñoPasillo1"]:54: in function [C]: in function 'DataDumper' [string "ShaderToolkit old"]:1823: in function 'bind' [string "LightSueñoPasillo1"]:10: in function [C]: in function 'xpcall' [string "LightSueñoPasillo1"]:1: in main chunk17:04:36: no uniform pass in shader[/code] This makes reference to this:[code] bind("light1", "lights[0].targetpos", point(inverty(field("{x=500,y=500}")), 0))[/code]It looks like light1 doesn't exist. Could that be the problem?Thank you for your time.

Did you replace the shader toolkit script with the latest one Simon added to the wiki after the release of the current public build of Visionaire Studio?

[quote]So far it's okay with bug count:- mp3 not working- 3d chars not working- some minor stuff with the shader toolkitIf you aren't using any of that you're fine.[/quote]- action areas evoke crash- what about preload animations to store in cache? I think it doesn't work- the list of outfits animations doesn't allows own sorting - it's the preinstalled at every new start- this little bug with animation speed between 33 and 35ms (and somewhere else?)

lol you're making shader complainers look bad with your biased opinion. But remember. Only you're here, though there are a lot of complainers. I don't have a time to deal with you now because as you said, I'm lazy and you're way STRONG at your opinion. I want to touch your muscle. lolAt least you and I prefer VS more than other game engines in common. It's positive isn't it?

LOL I have been spending my time in here more than 3 months and now I finally get criticism. Hooray. Really thank you.Okay, on the topic.Why? Because do you know how many MB will cost to make a video? My goal is optimising the game at all costs. Besides, in order to make the video I should load same images, same layers and decorate it again which is already done in-game. And then, if I made the video it means it's skippable otherwise It can't when I made the fake cutscene in-game.Anyway, you have some potential errors in your logic.[quote]Come on guys, VS is supposed to be a game engine not Adobe After Effects.[/quote]Guys? Only me complained about current shader updates yet.[quote]But instead, we are dealing with problems like "particles shouldn't follow the camera movement in my little splash animation that I could have done in 5 minutes in other software".[/quote]We? Are you devs? You sound like their barrister, even their barrister wouldn't say like that.Your logic is all towards 'Stop spending goddamn times at so-called shader action and give me goddamn turning animation(surprisingly it's possible by magic) for the character'. You said I should let devs alone but you already made the false point that getting all rid of potential for improving shader action.They had hard times to develop shader actions and what I did asking correction for their new work in order to make it less bug-friendly, more stable than before for other potential customers.Finally, your logic will let VS remain as old fashioned game engine. Just like in PS1 era most cut-scenes were CG videos that cost many capacities from the games. What you said about 'camera working useless lololol' is completely nonsense for recent video game histories. After god-damn videos were deleted and replaced by real time event the players can immerse in the game more than before because they can't let their controller down to react at button actions, which weren't existed in old games. It's innovation. By the way, perhaps you didn't handle other game engines, did you? VS still needs many things to be 'better' adventure game engine.